A Django site.
August 5, 2010

Funding Matters Weblog News
fundingnews
Funding Matters - Home is about »
» FP7 Calls – 2011 Work Programmes published

The latest FP7 calls which cover a number of thematic and multidisciplinary areas have been announced at the end of July through the publication of the 2011 Work Programmes. There are 51 new calls which cover four FP7 specific programmes (Cooperation, Ideas, People and Capacities) across areas including Health, Security, Energy, Environment and Transport. Deadlines vary across the four specific programmes.

FP7 Cooperation

The specific programme on ‘Co-operation’ supports fosters collaborative research across Europe and other partner countries through projects by transnational consortia of industry and academia. Research will be carried out in ten key thematic themes:

-Health (3 calls)

-Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, and Biotechnology (FAFB) (5 calls)

-Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) (8 calls)

-Nanosciences, Nanotechnologies, Materials and new Production Technologies (12 calls)

-Energy (8 calls)

-Environment (including Climate Change) (8 calls)

-Transport (including Aeronautics) (9 calls)

-Socio-Economic Sciences and the Humanities (4 calls)

-Space (1 call)

-Security (1 call)

More Information: Cooperation Calls

FP7 Ideas (European Research Council, ERC)

The Ideas programme will support “frontier research” solely on the basis of scientific excellence. Research may be carried out in any area of science or technology, including engineering, socio-economic sciences and the humanities. In contrast with the Cooperation programme, there is no obligation for cross-border partnerships. Projects are implemented by “individual teams” around a “principal investigator”.

ERC Starting Independent Researcher Grants

ERC Starting Grants aim to provide critical and adequate support to the independent careers of excellent researchers, whatever their nationality, who are at the stage of establishing or consolidating their own independent research team or programme.

More Information: Ideas Calls

FP7 People (Marie Curie)

The People programme provides support for researcher mobility and career development, both for researchers inside the European Union and internationally. It is implemented via a set of Marie Curie actions, providing fellowships and other measures to help researchers build their skills and competences throughout their careers. Calls which have recently been announced are:

Marie Curie Industry-Academia Partnerships and Pathways (IAPP)

This activity will seek to open and foster dynamic pathways between public research organisations and private commercial enterprises, particularly SMEs. It aims to achieve this predominately by secondments between sectors and networking activities.

Marie Curie Initial Training Networks 2011 (ITN)

This action aims to improve career perspectives of early-stage researchers in both public and private sectors, thereby making research careers more attractive to young people. This will be achieved through a trans-national networking mechanism, aimed at structuring the existing high-quality initial research training capacity throughout Member States and associated countries. Direct or indirect involvement of organisations from different sectors, including (lead-) participation by private enterprises in appropriate fields, is considered essential in the action.

More Information: People Calls

FP7 Capacities

There are a number of interesting schemes under the ‘Capacities’ specific programme that cut across a number of research themes. It can be approached in a more bottom-up way than the ‘Co-operation’ programme. The programme aims to support the coherent development of policies; complement the Co-operation programme; contribute to EU policies and initiatives to improve the coherence and impact of Member States policies; find synergies with regional and cohesion policies, the Structural Funds, education and training programmes and the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme (CIP). Within ‘Capacities’ there are seven main activities which can be seen below:

-Research Infrastructures (3 calls)

-Research for the benefit of SMEs (2 calls)

-Regions of Knowledge (1 call)

-Research Potential (1 call)

-Science in Society (2 calls)

-Activities of International Cooperation (3 calls)

More information: Capacities Calls

Please visit the relevant call links above or contact the European Office for advice on which call is best suited to your needs.

EuRO recommends that anyone who is interested in accessing EU funding makes contact with the European Office in plenty of time prior to the submission deadline to fully benefit from our professional advice and support.

Any application for external funding requires the completion of an External Funding Application Submission (EFAS) form, to create a form please visit EFAS

March 25, 2010

Funding Matters Weblog News
fundingnews
Funding Matters - Home is about »
» Prime Minister's Initiative (PMI2 Connect) - UK-US Partnership

Funding Source: British Council

Overview: PMI2 Connect has successfully funded 235 Higher Education international partnerships in research co-operation, collaborative programme delivery, international mobility of UK students, partnership development grants and China-UK collaborative partnerships in entrepreneurship and employability.

Funding:

1. UK-US New Partnership Fund:

PMI2 invites joint proposals from UK and US higher education institutions to develop partnerships. Funds are intended to stimulate the growth of a new variety of UK-US strategic partnerships between HEIs or for the growing of UK-US cooperation involving HEIs in third countries. Up to 20 projects up to a maximum value of £20,000 per project in 2010 to 2011 will be funded by PMI2. UK institutions can register their interest for a US partner by filling out the UK Register of Interest.

Deadline: 1730 GMT on 31 October 2010.

2. US Travel Grants:

A grant of up to £1,500 is available to support the development of strategic partnership discussions between UK institutions and potential US partner institutions. Priority will be given to science, technology, engineering, mathematics and medical sciences, however the UK-US New Partnership’s Fund Committee will also welcome proposals which introduce innovative – including inter-disciplinary – approaches.

Deadline: 1730 GMT on 30 April 2010.

3. UK-US Partnership: Realising the Potential:

A one day conference will be held in London at the Royal Society of the Arts on 13 May 2010. The aim of the conference is to:

a) launch the PMI2 Connect report ‘UK-US Higher Education Partnerships: Realising the Potential’

b) provide details of the PMI2 Connect UK-US New Partnership Fund and application process

c) include presentations from leading UK and US academics

d) offer workshops to consider key activity areas for partnerships

Funder Link: For further information, please refer to British Council website

If you are interested in applying please contact the Research Office for an External Funding Application Submission (EFAS) form or call ext. 3713.

EuRO recommends that anyone who is interested in accessing EU funding makes contact with the European Office in plenty of time prior to the submission deadline to fully benefit from our professional advice and support.

March 24, 2010

Welsh Institue of Health and Social Care Blog
wihsc
is about »
» Out of dependency…

The dominant model (I don’t say the only model) of doctor-patient consultation privileges one viewpoint: the doctor’s. The relationship is a power relationship in which the doctor remains largely unquestioned and the patient is mostly powerless.

Whether benign or not, the balance of this relationship may be shifting, indeed has to change, if we are to deliver world-class health outcomes for users of health services in Wales, and to do so within the financial constraints the NHS is facing.

Last Tuesday’s Times (16 March 2010) published a letter (We must treat our minor ills ourselves) signed by a number of doctors and related professionals bewailing the fact that the ‘worried well’, half of them of working age, now represent approaching 20% of GP time. The ‘catastrophic impact of this dependency’ is detailed in the accompanying full-page (3) article (Workforce wimps cost NHS billions)which ‘demonstrates’ the huge costs of attending to the minor ills of half of those making 51.4 million visits for colds, headaches, back pain, indigestion etc: £2billion annually. (This is not to ignore the fact that, in a few cases, the presenting minor problem masks a deeper more serious disease or condition.) 90% of those visits for minor ailments resulted in a prescription.

In one way, the perception that patients, by and large, are powerless, might be challenged when we see them as having the capacity to drive the NHS this way. But GPs speaking about their own ‘victimhood’ behaviours, in an unreasonably demand-led culture of service use, does not change the central fact of the relationship that people have with their health professionals. If they have learned to be sick, to roll over and adopt the position of acquiescent or plaintive patient, so too have doctors learned to treat them in ways that remove most of their best opportunities for self-management. Launched in their letter to the Times, the Campaign for Self-Care has to be careful not to make the same mistakes.

If GPs feel compelled to (merely) manage ‘insatiable’ patient behaviours, then surely mitigating those very problems which affect the users of their services will bring them immediate benefits as practitioners? The way that people can be ‘empowered’ to better manage their health conditions, and not just minor ones, can lead directly to relieving the worst aspects of the ‘patient experience’, creating better health outcomes and contributing to the shift in behaviours that could, the Times suggests, lead to £10bn saving over five years. Unfortunately the emphasis in the article is mostly on (negative) patient behaviours: when the question of how doctors behave arises Dr Dixon, a GP from Devon, is quoted as saying: ‘…health awareness [on behalf of the patient]…needs to be balanced with more information on when you need to see someone [or not]. We have become merchants in investigations and referrals and our teaching role is one we need to invest in as well.’

The role of doctors as teachers of self-management skills is welcome. Self-managing health conditions is a very real solution to demand-led dependency. But users of services cannot become wise and responsible users without the tools to do so, and responsibility for their behaviour change cannot be simply expected of them without those tools. The opportunities to acquire them have to be grown rapidly and widely.

Empowering service users is not a question of defeating them in a war of attrition; enabling them to learn the skills to re-orientate their expectations, and to be well-informed about the decisions they do (need to) make, depends on giving them the power to engage in decision-making and act positively based on knowledge. The architect of the NHS, Aneurin Bevan once said ‘The purpose of getting power is to be able to give it away’. Practitioners need to recognise that their part in the dependency culture is not just better management of patient behaviours and expectations, but their own too. Genuine partnership is the key tool to achieve the win-win-win for patient, practitioner and organisation together.

Better outcomes, better use of scarce resources (practitioner time, money etc), depend critically on building a better focus for delivery of healthcare, and enabling all parties to behave differently when appropriate. If 90% of people who turn up in front of their GP with chest pain have no event or disease, then why on earth are we not enabling those people to make better decisions about their situations to everybody’s benefit? This does not preclude calling 999; far from it. But it means doing so when there is good reason, and knowing what a good reason looks like (thus, by contrast, knowing what is insufficient to warrant intervention). It means not heading to the GP with a sniffle, but knowing what to do if that cough begins to create breathing difficulties.

We have been conditioned to ‘play patient’; the NHS makes us ‘sick’. But being sick is not the same as having a disease or health condition. Disease is objective, medically diagnosed pathology; illness, the feelings that are associated with some disease/condition. Sickness however, is a social status granted to the person who is ill. It is a means to getting time off work, benefit support, a cup of tea in bed with some paracetemol, sympathy, help. We still incline people to play the sick role, and reinforce it by constantly refusing and indeed removing opportunities for patients to become informed, decision-making, service users, real partners in their healthcare and condition management.

The doctor’s armoury has relied in the past on their prestige as experts: we generally think of those who get the chance to study medicine as being amongst the brightest. This intelligence puts them in a class of decision-makers that others can feel uncomfortable to challenge. Added to this, their professional expertise, especially because of the inherent nature of healthcare giving, quickly creates a locus for unchallenged opinion based on that expertise. When a doctor says take this pill and you will feel better, have this operation and we can save your life, how can we be surprised that people jump immediately and uncritically to rely on that expertise?

Carry on Doctor, nowdays deeply culturally insensitive, caricatured this model of delivery, but Sir Lancelot Spratt would not have been remotely funny at that time if the parody did not strike at a truth. Some older (no disrespect) consultants will admit they were trained to act like ‘gods’. Sadly, a few, and not just older practitioners, still think they can act this way with impunity and resent any challenge to their power as doctors.

But challenge is not always for its own sake: joint-decision making is nothing to fear or resent.

There have been attempts to enable patients to become managers of their own conditions and sometimes these work well enough. They just don’t travel far enough, and perversely, some patients are reinforced in their roles as ‘sick’. Additionally, programmes to teach patients to become ‘experts’ are flawed. There is a false opposition between the patient’s ‘expertise’, living their condition, and medical training and experience.

Real partnership in healthcare does not dispense with medical expertise. On the contrary, such partnership continues to rely heavily on the professional’s gifts and training: it is the nature of that reliance, away from dependency to condition management, away from the medical model to medically supported decision-making, which is the step-change required now.

‘Incorporating the patient’s viewpoint’, i.e. bringing this into the doctor’s model, not giving it genuinely equal status, nor rearranging the entire relationship between ‘perspectives’, is not a solution. The Calgary-Cambridge guide to medical interviewing (all 71 points of it) still fails to address the key solution, as current condition-management programmes still fail to achieve the desired better health outcomes, better use of GP and other health practitioner time and better organisational returns in terms of the available cost-benefits. ‘Patient-centredness’ is not enough.

I was involved in a trial to support patients admitted with stroke/CVAs through the A&E; of one of the largest acute hospitals in Northern Ireland. A multi-disciplinary team (MDT), physios, OTs, nursing staff, social workers, speech therapists and any other relevant professional, all led by the consultant in charge, set out to improve services to emergency admissions and to create better outcomes for people with strokes. The person missing was the patient (and/or patient representative), but that was in 1978!

To this day, MDTs meet regularly in hospitals and still the person missing is the patient. We want people to stop adopting the sick role, to deal with their illness and disease or condition in a way that can defeat the pressure of insatiable demand for services. But we will not countenance the very thing that will bring this about.

The move to patient-centredness is certainly not new and may be already tired, especially when we have so demonstrably discouraged patients from building any skills that would allow them to self-manage appropriately. Imposing solutions from an organisational point of view won’t do either in a modern age: practitioner and organisational need cannot be served before service user outcomes if the world-class health outcomes are to become real. We cannot be satisfied with patient-centredness, especially in the absence of the person whose life it is.

The NHS has moved from its first days where doctors and opticians were directly engaged through the monies contributed by Tredegar miners and steelworkers, to serve the health needs of the community. In the 21st century we need (again?) a relationship in which the patient is the primary decision-maker, but their informed decision-making is in equal partnership with the expertise around them. We can reduce the dependency relationships patients have with the NHS, but we need do it in an intelligent and sustainable manner.

Written by Dr Kevin Fitzpatrick, WIHSC Associate

1. Waddell, G & Aylward M The scientific and conceptual basis of incapacity benefits TSO 2005 (p7)

March 15, 2010

Funding Matters Weblog News
fundingnews
Funding Matters - Home is about »
» Prime Minister's Initiative - PMI2 Connect - LAST CHANCE!

Funding Source: British Council

Overview: Launched in April 2006, the Prime Minister’s Initiative for International Education (PMI2) is a five-year strategy which aims to secure the UK’s position as a leader in international education and sustain the growth of UK international education delivered in the UK and overseas.

PMI2’s aims:

1. Promote the benefits of a UK education to international students;

2. Ensure international students have a positive experience of their UK studies;

3. Help UK and international education providers to build strategic alliances and partnerships, and demonstrate the value of the UK as a partner in policy and delivery;

4. Diversify and consolidate markets;

Funding: A grant of up to £2,000 is available to support the development of strategic partnership discussions between UK institutions and potential partner institutions located in the following priority countries: China; Hong Kong; South Korea; Malaysia; Thailand; Vietnam; Gulf States (Saudi Arabia, Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Oman, Kuwait, Bahrain); Nigeria and Ghana.

All travel must be completed by 30 June 2010. The guidelines and application forms do differ depending on country you wish to visit.

There is no restriction on the number of grants your institution can apply for; however they will not accept more than one application for the same visit. You may use the grant to cover more than one person’s trip in the same visit. If you apply for more than one grant, the proposals must be to visit different places.

It is worth taking into account that the evaluation panel will be looking for a good spread of grants across the UK Higher Education sector and the funding opportunity is very popular.

If you fail in your bid for one application, you cannot resubmit the same application with updates to it.

This will be the last Partnership Development Grant call under PMI2, as the programme closes in March 2011. A successor programme has yet to be confirmed.

Successful story: Professor Alan Hawley (Head of the R & D Centre for Disasters and Resilience) has received a partnership development grant from PMI2 to further develop links with institutions in the Chongqinq province in China.

Deadline: 31 March 2010, 5:30pm

Funder Link: For further information, please refer to British Council website.

If you are interested in applying please contact the Research Office for an External Funding Application Submission (EFAS) form or call ext. 3713.

EuRO recommends that anyone who is interested in accessing EU funding makes contact with the European Office in plenty of time prior to the submission deadline to fully benefit from our professional advice and support.

August 12, 2008

Funding Matters Weblog News
fundingnews
Funding Matters - Home is about »
» UK - China Collaborative Partnerships in Employability and Entrepreneurship

Funding Source: Prime Ministers Initiative (PMI2)

Summary:

The PMI2 is pleased to invite proposals from UK Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) to work with Chinese HEIs on developing the themes of employability and entrepreneurship at the higher education level. The overall aim of the UK-China Collaborative Partnerships scheme is to strengthen the UK China partnership: universities are challenged with helping to develop the global citizen for the 21st Century and partnership work in this area will benefit the development of both national and international models. We encourage UK universities to engage in equal partnership with Chinese universities which will both build on existing undergraduate / postgraduate programmes delivered in the UK and China and further develop these programmes to produce work-ready, employable graduates.

The programme looks to seek to fund 8 projects between UK and Chinese universities. In particular, applications for projects are welcomed with partners based outside of Beijing and Shanghai. Hong Kong is not eligible for this scheme.

Sum: Total funding over 2 years: Year 1-up to a max. £20,000; Year 2-up to a max.£15,000.

Deadline: 10 October 2008

Funder Link: PMI2

Scheme Link: UK-China Collaboration

If you are interested in applying please contact the Research Office for an External Funding Application Submission (EFAS) form or call ext. 3713.

EuRO recommends that anyone who is interested in accessing EU funding makes contact with the European Office in plenty of time prior to the submission deadline to fully benefit from our professional advice and support.